PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEVD.DE achieves a 49.63% return, which is significantly higher than WELL.DE's 16.86% return.


IEVD.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
49.63%
6M
50.75%
1Y
75.04%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

WELL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
16.86%
6M
17.48%
1Y
35.47%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IEVD.DE
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
49.63%10.71%5.35%22.95%-10.94%
WELL.DE
Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
16.86%9.77%38.81%57.34%-8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IEVD.DE and WELL.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022

0.67

The correlation between IEVD.DE and WELL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEVD.DE
IEVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

WELL.DE
WELL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WELL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEVD.DEWELL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

2.18

+4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.54

5.49

+13.05

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the WELL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEVD.DE and WELL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.30%, which is greater than WELL.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVD.DE and WELL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVD.DEWELL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.30%

-28.78%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-16.18%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.25%

-28.78%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-6.22%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-4.75%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

6.44%

-2.41%

Volatility

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) at 7.69%. This indicates that IEVD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVD.DEWELL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

7.69%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.82%

15.47%

+6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.31%

20.98%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.76%

22.43%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

22.43%

+1.73%

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEVD.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than WELL.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEVD.DE vs. WELL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IEVD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IEVD.DE and WELL.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WELL.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELL.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IEVD.DE.

IEVD.DE tracks STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology, while WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IEVD.DE and 0.18% for WELL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEVD.DE and WELL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer