PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IETH vs. ICRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IETH vs. ICRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETH achieves a -33.82% return, which is significantly lower than ICRC's -5.38% return.


IETH

1D
-5.08%
1M
-18.82%
YTD
-33.82%
6M
-35.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICRC

1D
-8.76%
1M
-16.63%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-7.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IETH vs. ICRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IETH and ICRC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IETH vs. ICRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IETH vs. ICRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IETHICRCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.13

-0.79

-0.34

Drawdowns

IETH vs. ICRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETH drawdown since its inception was -55.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ICRC drawdown of -55.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETH and ICRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IETHICRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.94%

-55.65%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.25%

-41.04%

-13.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-32.47%

-4.63%

Volatility

IETH vs. ICRC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IETHICRCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.79%

67.59%

-7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.79%

67.59%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.79%

67.59%

-7.80%

IETH vs. ICRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IETH has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ICRC's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

IETH vs. ICRC - Dividend Comparison

IETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.99%, more than ICRC's 42.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IETH and ICRC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IETH is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IETH is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ICRC.

IETH has the higher dividend yield at 46.99%, compared with 42.62% for ICRC.

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for IETH and 0.98% for ICRC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IETH and ICRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer