IETC vs. TSXU
IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). IETC is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IETC charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
IETC vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
IETC
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- 30.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.23%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IETC vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 13.88% | -0.59% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IETC and TSXU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IETC vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
IETC
TSXU
IETC vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IETC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IETC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 4.53 | -3.66 |
Drawdowns
IETC vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IETC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -35.62% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.92% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -10.56% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility
IETC vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IETC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.04% | 78.68% | -57.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 78.68% | -54.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 78.68% | -53.31% |
IETC vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IETC vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IETC and TSXU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.34% for IETC.
IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for IETC and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer