PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IETC vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IETC vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.


IETC

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.03%
YTD
4.48%
6M
4.29%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*

LUNR

1D
-13.12%
1M
-25.39%
YTD
64.02%
6M
122.39%
1Y
144.44%
3Y*
42.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IETC vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IETC
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF
4.48%19.56%37.57%54.35%-32.78%-0.92%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.02%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IETC and LUNR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.23

The correlation between IETC and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IETC vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IETC
IETC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IETC vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IETCLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

3.47

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

7.12

-4.82

IETC vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IETC Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IETC and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IETC vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IETCLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-97.43%

+58.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-41.94%

+20.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.17%

-78.54%

+53.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-67.53%

+57.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-63.21%

+55.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

20.37%

-12.70%

Volatility

IETC vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) is 9.62%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that IETC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IETCLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.62%

42.95%

-33.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

93.42%

-75.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.11%

111.16%

-89.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.70%

171.29%

-146.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.44%

171.29%

-145.85%

Dividends

IETC vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IETC
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF
0.37%0.38%0.52%0.79%0.92%0.73%0.48%0.95%1.27%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IETC and LUNR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to IETC (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IETC and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer