IETC vs. CHPS
IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. IETC is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, IETC returned 27.98% vs 211.40% for CHPS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IETC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
IETC vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.
IETC
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 23.46%
- YTD
- 103.69%
- 6M
- 107.58%
- 1Y
- 211.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IETC vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 12.03% | 19.56% | 37.57% | 10.84% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 103.69% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IETC and CHPS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IETC and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IETC vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IETC
CHPS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IETC
CHPS
Communication Services
IETC
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IETC
CHPS
-
Industrials
IETC
CHPS
Financial Services
IETC
CHPS
Real Estate
IETC
CHPS
-
Healthcare
IETC
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
IETC
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
IETC
-
CHPS
-
Energy
IETC
-
CHPS
Utilities
IETC
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IETC vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
IETC
CHPS
IETC vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IETC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.78 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 12.16 | -10.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 47.22 | -43.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IETC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 6.17 | -4.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.77 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
IETC vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IETC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -39.44% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -17.50% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -2.06% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -9.15% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 4.50% | +3.01% |
Volatility
IETC vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) is 6.78%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that IETC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IETC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 14.07% | -7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 28.29% | -11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 34.50% | -13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 33.78% | -9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 33.78% | -8.40% |
IETC vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IETC vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than CHPS's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.33% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IETC and CHPS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to IETC (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 211.40% vs 27.98% for IETC. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IETC has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 211.40% return vs 27.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IETC.
IETC has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.33% for CHPS.
IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IETC and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer