IETC vs. AIRR
IETC (iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. IETC is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IETC returned 15.73%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IETC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
IETC vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return.
IETC
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 25.69%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
IETC vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF | 4.48% | 19.56% | 37.57% | 54.35% | -32.78% | 29.73% | 46.59% | 43.09% | -3.75% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -17.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IETC and AIRR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IETC and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
IETC vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IETC
AIRR
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IETC
AIRR
Communication Services
IETC
AIRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
IETC
AIRR
-
Industrials
IETC
AIRR
Financial Services
IETC
AIRR
Real Estate
IETC
AIRR
-
Healthcare
IETC
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
IETC
-
AIRR
-
Consumer Defensive
IETC
-
AIRR
-
Energy
IETC
-
AIRR
Utilities
IETC
-
AIRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IETC vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
IETC
AIRR
IETC vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IETC | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 5.01 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | 18.33 | -16.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IETC vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IETC | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -42.37% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -13.09% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | -27.95% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.48% | -27.95% | -10.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -1.89% | -8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -7.48% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.67% | 3.57% | +4.10% |
Volatility
IETC vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) have volatilities of 9.62% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IETC | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 9.32% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 20.81% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.11% | 26.19% | -4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.70% | 25.45% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 26.36% | -0.92% |
IETC vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IETC vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IETC and AIRR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IETC has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to AIRR (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 15.73% for IETC. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
IETC has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IETC and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer