IESU.L vs. XLEP.L
IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - IESU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR while XLEP.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IESU.L returned 8.52%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for XLEP.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IESU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLEP.L.
Performance
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IESU.L having a 27.25% return and XLEP.L slightly higher at 28.14%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IESU.L having a 8.52% annualized return and XLEP.L not far ahead at 8.71%.
IESU.L
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- YTD
- 27.25%
- 1Y
- 35.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
XLEP.L
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- YTD
- 28.14%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 22.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.25% | 2.26% | 5.45% | -5.96% | 83.53% | 53.82% | -35.62% | 5.37% | -13.39% | -10.01% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 28.14% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -14.05% | -9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESU.L and XLEP.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IESU.L and XLEP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IESU.L
XLEP.L
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESU.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.23 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 5.41 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESU.L drawdown since its inception was -63.88%, roughly equal to the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESU.L and XLEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESU.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.88% | -63.35% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.34% | -16.17% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.36% | -24.06% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.36% | -24.16% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.16% | -63.35% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.59% | -10.36% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -16.95% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.13% | 6.66% | +0.47% |
Volatility
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) have volatilities of 7.73% and 7.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESU.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 7.45% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.73% | 20.84% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.62% | 24.03% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 26.38% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 28.17% | +0.99% |
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IESU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IESU.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESU.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IESU.L and XLEP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IESU.L.
IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IESU.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.
Find the right allocation for IESU.L and XLEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer