IESU.L vs. SPXE.L
IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPXE.L (Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IESU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR, while SPXE.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IESU.L returned 23.21%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for SPXE.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IESU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPXE.L.
Performance
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IESU.L is traded in GBp, while SPXE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESU.L achieves a 30.39% return, which is significantly higher than SPXE.L's 9.06% return.
IESU.L
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 30.39%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 23.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.04%
SPXE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.18%
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.39% | 2.26% | 5.45% | -5.96% | 83.53% | 53.82% | 8.62% |
SPXE.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.06% | 9.57% | 26.72% | 21.98% | -8.25% | 33.54% | 21.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESU.L and SPXE.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between IESU.L and SPXE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IESU.L
SPXE.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IESU.L
SPXE.L
Basic Materials
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Communication Services
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Consumer Cyclical
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Consumer Defensive
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Financial Services
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Healthcare
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Industrials
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Real Estate
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Technology
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Utilities
IESU.L
-
SPXE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L — Risk / Return Rank
IESU.L
SPXE.L
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESU.L | SPXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.26 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 11.66 | -6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESU.L drawdown since its inception was -63.88%, which is greater than SPXE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESU.L and SPXE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESU.L | SPXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.88% | -21.81% | -42.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.34% | -6.78% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.36% | -21.81% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.36% | -21.81% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.40% | -2.51% | -6.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -3.35% | -17.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 1.90% | +5.29% |
Volatility
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L) at 3.30%. This indicates that IESU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESU.L | SPXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 3.30% | +4.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.76% | 9.18% | +12.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.61% | 12.18% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.98% | 15.63% | +13.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 18.22% | +10.95% |
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IESU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXE.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IESU.L vs. SPXE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESU.L nor SPXE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IESU.L and SPXE.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXE.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXE.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IESU.L.
IESU.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPXE.L is S&P 500. IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR, while SPXE.L tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IESU.L and 0.09% for SPXE.L.
Find the right allocation for IESU.L and SPXE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer