PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESU.L vs. RNRU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IESU.L is traded in GBp, while RNRU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the RNRU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESU.L achieves a 28.61% return, which is significantly higher than RNRU.L's 8.66% return.


IESU.L

1D
1.07%
1M
4.80%
6M
20.56%
YTD
28.61%
1Y
35.99%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
22.82%
10Y*
8.50%

RNRU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.14%
6M
3.30%
YTD
8.66%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
0.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.61%2.26%5.45%-5.96%83.53%-1.88%
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
8.66%24.83%-21.90%-19.50%-0.25%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IESU.L and RNRU.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.15

The correlation between IESU.L and RNRU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESU.L
IESU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IESU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IESU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RNRU.L
RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESU.LRNRU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.92

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

6.94

-1.93

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESU.L and RNRU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESU.L drawdown since its inception was -63.88%, which is greater than RNRU.L's maximum drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESU.L and RNRU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESU.LRNRU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.88%

-53.53%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.34%

-13.70%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

-36.73%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.65%

-27.42%

+16.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-28.94%

+8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.16%

3.77%

+3.39%

Volatility

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) at 4.57%. This indicates that IESU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESU.LRNRU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

4.57%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.74%

12.18%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

16.25%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.08%

18.24%

+10.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.16%

18.24%

+10.92%

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RNRU.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IESU.L vs. RNRU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IESU.L nor RNRU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IESU.L and RNRU.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNRU.L.

IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR, while RNRU.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IESU.L and 0.50% for RNRU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESU.L and RNRU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer