PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESU.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IESU.L is traded in GBp, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESU.L achieves a 25.22% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 28.47% return.


IESU.L

1D
0.70%
1M
1.19%
6M
16.95%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
22.17%
10Y*
8.35%

IWVG.L

1D
-2.49%
1M
-4.98%
6M
24.42%
YTD
28.47%
1Y
54.93%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
25.22%2.26%5.45%-5.96%83.53%53.82%-35.62%5.37%-4.14%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
28.47%31.27%6.58%13.08%1.04%21.24%-6.86%14.68%-8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IESU.L and IWVG.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.48

The correlation between IESU.L and IWVG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESU.L
IESU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IESU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IESU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESU.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.67

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

7.82

-5.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

25.39

-20.74

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESU.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESU.L drawdown since its inception was -63.88%, which is greater than IWVG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESU.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESU.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.88%

-28.07%

-35.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.34%

-6.99%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

-13.92%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

-13.92%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

-6.26%

-6.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-4.29%

-16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.14%

2.16%

+4.98%

Volatility

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) at 6.15%. This indicates that IESU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESU.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

6.15%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.63%

13.11%

+8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.53%

14.94%

+9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.07%

13.44%

+15.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.15%

15.68%

+13.47%

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IESU.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

IESU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.93%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IESU.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

IESU.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IESU.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESU.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer