PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESU.L vs. GSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IESU.L is traded in GBp, while GSPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GSPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESU.L achieves a 27.25% return, which is significantly higher than GSPX.L's 9.80% return.


IESU.L

1D
2.33%
1M
3.67%
6M
18.53%
YTD
27.25%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
22.56%
10Y*
8.52%

GSPX.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.32%
6M
8.49%
YTD
9.80%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.25%2.26%5.45%-5.96%83.53%53.82%-35.62%5.37%-19.87%
GSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.80%17.16%24.72%24.87%-20.64%28.96%15.11%27.76%-7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IESU.L and GSPX.L is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.30

The correlation between IESU.L and GSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESU.L
IESU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IESU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IESU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GSPX.L
GSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESU.LGSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.65

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

10.82

-5.86

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESU.L and GSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESU.L drawdown since its inception was -63.88%, which is greater than GSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESU.L and GSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESU.LGSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.88%

-34.98%

-28.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.34%

-8.37%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

-18.97%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

-25.80%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.59%

-0.71%

-10.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-5.56%

-14.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

2.05%

+5.08%

Volatility

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) at 2.92%. This indicates that IESU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESU.LGSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

2.92%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.73%

9.27%

+12.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.62%

12.05%

+12.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.09%

16.14%

+12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.16%

17.62%

+11.54%

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPX.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IESU.L vs. GSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

IESU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.80%0.89%0.99%1.15%1.40%0.96%1.31%1.50%0.11%
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IESU.L and GSPX.L have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSPX.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IESU.L.

IESU.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while GSPX.L is S&P 500. IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR, while GSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IESU.L and 0.10% for GSPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESU.L and GSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer