PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESG.L vs. ESES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESG.L achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than ESES.L's 20.07% return.


IESG.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.16%
6M
4.35%
YTD
7.43%
1Y
9.06%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
8.44%

ESES.L

1D
-1.40%
1M
-8.29%
6M
13.84%
YTD
20.07%
1Y
35.10%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IESG.L
iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF
7.43%8.44%0.88%14.27%-9.89%6.83%
ESES.L
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.07%24.05%7.54%2.94%-11.14%6,848.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IESG.L and ESES.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021

0.55

The correlation between IESG.L and ESES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESG.L vs. ESES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESG.L
IESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ESES.L
ESES.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ESES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ESES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESG.LESES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.24

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

9.91

-7.28

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ESES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESG.L and ESES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than ESES.L's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESG.L and ESES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESG.LESES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-23.59%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-10.79%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-23.59%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-23.59%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-10.05%

+7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-10.52%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.53%

-0.09%

Volatility

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) is 3.49%, while Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that IESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESG.LESES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

7.19%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

17.05%

-6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

19.11%

-6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

21.67%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

3,195.40%

-3,179.62%

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IESG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESES.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IESG.L vs. ESES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IESG.L nor ESES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IESG.L and ESES.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESES.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESES.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IESG.L.

IESG.L is categorized as ESG, while ESES.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IESG.L tracks MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while ESES.L tracks MSCI EM Universal Select Business Screens Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IESG.L and 0.19% for ESES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESG.L and ESES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer