IESG.L vs. EMUS.L
IESG.L (iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF) and EMUS.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IESG.L is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while EMUS.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IESG.L returned 5.24%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for EMUS.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IESG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EMUS.L.
Performance
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IESG.L is traded in GBp, while EMUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESG.L achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than EMUS.L's -1.46% return.
IESG.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 9.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
EMUS.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESG.L iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF | 7.43% | 8.44% | 0.88% | 14.27% | -9.89% | 17.71% |
EMUS.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.46% | 0.32% | 7.37% | 1.67% | -1.12% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESG.L and EMUS.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IESG.L
EMUS.L
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESG.L | EMUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.05 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.27 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 0.59 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than EMUS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESG.L and EMUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESG.L | EMUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -12.49% | -21.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -7.36% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -9.37% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -12.49% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -4.13% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -4.72% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.41% | +0.03% |
Volatility
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMUS.L) at 2.01%. This indicates that IESG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESG.L | EMUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.01% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 5.53% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 7.18% | +5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 8.38% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 8.32% | +7.46% |
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IESG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMUS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IESG.L vs. EMUS.L - Dividend Comparison
IESG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMUS.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.79% | 5.39% | 4.96% | 4.62% | 3.79% | 1.17% |
IESG.L iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IESG.L and EMUS.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EMUS.L.
IESG.L is categorized as ESG, while EMUS.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. IESG.L tracks MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while EMUS.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IESG.L and 0.35% for EMUS.L.
Find the right allocation for IESG.L and EMUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer