IESG.L vs. EMAU.L
IESG.L (iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF) and EMAU.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IESG.L is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while EMAU.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IESG.L returned 7.76%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for EMAU.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IESG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EMAU.L.
Performance
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IESG.L is traded in GBp, while EMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESG.L achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than EMAU.L's 0.82% return.
IESG.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 9.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
EMAU.L
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESG.L iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF | 7.43% | 8.44% | 0.88% | 14.27% | -9.89% | 5.02% |
EMAU.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.82% | 0.36% | 7.52% | 1.50% | -0.80% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESG.L and EMAU.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IESG.L
EMAU.L
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESG.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.12 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.90 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 2.36 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than EMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -12.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESG.L and EMAU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESG.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -12.44% | -21.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -4.84% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -8.77% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.89% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -4.47% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.86% | +1.58% |
Volatility
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L) at 2.23%. This indicates that IESG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESG.L | EMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.23% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 5.39% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 6.68% | +6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 8.44% | +7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 8.44% | +7.34% |
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IESG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAU.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IESG.L vs. EMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESG.L nor EMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IESG.L and EMAU.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EMAU.L.
IESG.L is categorized as ESG, while EMAU.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. IESG.L tracks MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while EMAU.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IESG.L and 0.35% for EMAU.L.
Find the right allocation for IESG.L and EMAU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer