PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEML.L vs. JPEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEML.L is traded in USD, while JPEE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the JPEE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEML.L achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than JPEE.L's 2.44% return.


IEML.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.97%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.93%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
2.18%

JPEE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.32%
YTD
2.44%
6M
3.02%
1Y
11.89%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.98%18.29%-2.61%11.29%-10.82%-10.44%1.80%11.74%-7.21%7.07%
JPEE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.44%14.20%5.65%9.93%-18.63%-1.37%5.06%15.84%-5.54%-0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IEML.L and JPEE.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEML.L
IEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEE.L
JPEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JPEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEML.LJPEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.66

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

10.90

-5.81

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the JPEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEML.L and JPEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEML.L drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, which is greater than JPEE.L's maximum drawdown of -31.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEML.L and JPEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEML.LJPEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-31.14%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-4.48%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.04%

-7.19%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-28.48%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

0.00%

-8.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-12.37%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.09%

+0.82%

Volatility

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEML.L) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L) at 1.71%. This indicates that IEML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEML.LJPEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

1.71%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

4.35%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.89%

5.96%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

9.22%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.08%

11.36%

-1.28%

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JPEE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Dividend Comparison

IEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, while JPEE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
6.76%5.16%5.69%5.02%5.54%4.67%4.83%5.24%5.71%4.99%5.50%3.49%
JPEE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEML.L and JPEE.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPEE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPEE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IEML.L.

IEML.L tracks J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified 10% Cap 1% Floor Index, while JPEE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IEML.L and 0.45% for JPEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEML.L and JPEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer