PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEMD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEMD.L is traded in EUR, while IEFM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEFM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IEMD.L having a 8.04% return and IEFM.L slightly lower at 7.87%.


IEMD.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.04%
6M
11.36%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*

IEFM.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.77%
YTD
7.87%
6M
11.34%
1Y
17.45%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
8.04%26.34%20.48%12.54%-14.50%21.92%10.99%29.63%-9.29%
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
7.87%26.11%20.58%12.71%-14.45%21.49%10.68%31.24%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMD.L and IEFM.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

0.95

The correlation between IEMD.L and IEFM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMD.L
IEFM.L

Financial Services

23.7%
23.3%

Healthcare

15.6%
16.0%

Industrials

15.2%
14.8%

Utilities

12.6%
12.2%

Energy

11.0%
11.2%

Technology

7.9%
8.4%

Basic Materials

7.6%
7.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

IEMD.L
23.7%
IEFM.L
23.3%

Healthcare

IEMD.L
15.6%
IEFM.L
16.0%

Industrials

IEMD.L
15.2%
IEFM.L
14.8%

Utilities

IEMD.L
12.6%
IEFM.L
12.2%

Energy

IEMD.L
11.0%
IEFM.L
11.2%

Technology

IEMD.L
7.9%
IEFM.L
8.4%

Basic Materials

IEMD.L
7.6%
IEFM.L
7.3%

Communication Services

IEMD.L
2.9%
IEFM.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

IEMD.L
2.8%
IEFM.L
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMD.L
0.5%
IEFM.L
0.5%

Real Estate

IEMD.L
0.4%
IEFM.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMD.L
IEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEMD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMD.LIEFM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.19

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

3.00

+2.56

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMD.L and IEFM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMD.LIEFM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.69

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.59

+0.12

Drawdowns

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -30.77%, roughly equal to the maximum IEFM.L drawdown of -31.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMD.L and IEFM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMD.LIEFM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.77%

-31.80%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-14.57%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-15.88%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-24.28%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.90%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-6.22%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

5.80%

-2.67%

Volatility

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEMD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) at 4.20%. This indicates that IEMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMD.LIEFM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.20%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

14.23%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

25.18%

-8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

18.27%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

17.48%

-0.66%

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEMD.L and IEFM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMD.L vs. IEFM.L - Dividend Comparison

IEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while IEFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.71%1.85%2.70%2.78%2.90%1.77%1.36%2.00%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IEMD.L and IEFM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMD.L and IEFM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe Momentum Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMD.L and IEFM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer