PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEI vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEI vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEI achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 7.28% return.


IEI

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.24%

NTSX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
7.28%
6M
7.49%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEI vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEI
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.30%6.96%1.81%4.42%-9.51%-2.54%6.95%5.71%2.83%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
7.28%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IEI and NTSX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.14

Over the past year, IEI and NTSX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEI vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEI
IEI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEI Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEI vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEINTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.42

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

10.43

-7.08

IEI vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEI and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEI vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEI drawdown since its inception was -14.60%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEI and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEINTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-31.34%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-9.16%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

-16.82%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.88%

-31.34%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-2.27%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-6.78%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.13%

-1.24%

Volatility

IEI vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) is 0.98%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that IEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEINTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

5.05%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

10.34%

-8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

12.92%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

17.13%

-12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.93%

18.30%

-14.37%

IEI vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEI vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

IEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than NTSX's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEI
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.64%3.48%3.18%2.36%1.37%0.73%1.12%2.01%1.95%1.51%1.33%1.39%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.09%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEI and NTSX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to IEI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEI dropped -14.60% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.23% vs 0.21% for IEI. On fees, IEI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IEI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.

IEI has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.

IEI is categorized as Government Bonds, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IEI and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEI and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer