PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFV.L is traded in GBp, while ESIE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFV.L achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.L's 34.22% return.


IEFV.L

1D
0.27%
1M
5.00%
YTD
12.95%
6M
16.06%
1Y
36.47%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
11.79%

ESIE.L

1D
-1.00%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
34.22%
6M
30.17%
1Y
59.36%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
12.95%42.20%5.40%11.41%1.47%18.58%3.81%
ESIE.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
34.22%20.13%-9.70%6.04%44.68%26.96%1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFV.L and ESIE.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.42

The correlation between IEFV.L and ESIE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFV.L
ESIE.L

Financial Services

22.6%

-

Industrials

17.4%

-

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Technology

12.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

6.3%

-

Energy

5.0%
99.1%

Utilities

4.4%

-

Communication Services

3.8%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Financial Services

IEFV.L
22.6%
ESIE.L

-

Industrials

IEFV.L
17.4%
ESIE.L

-

Healthcare

IEFV.L
12.5%
ESIE.L

-

Technology

IEFV.L
12.1%
ESIE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IEFV.L
8.6%
ESIE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IEFV.L
6.6%
ESIE.L

-

Basic Materials

IEFV.L
6.3%
ESIE.L

-

Energy

IEFV.L
5.0%
ESIE.L
99.1%

Utilities

IEFV.L
4.4%
ESIE.L

-

Communication Services

IEFV.L
3.8%
ESIE.L
0.9%

Real Estate

IEFV.L
0.7%
ESIE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIE.L
ESIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFV.LESIE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.45

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

4.87

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

14.82

-2.18

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFV.L and ESIE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFV.LESIE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.58

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.82

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.86

-0.27

Drawdowns

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than ESIE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFV.L and ESIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFV.LESIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-27.35%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-12.13%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-27.35%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

-27.35%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-6.99%

+6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-8.23%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.99%

-1.11%

Volatility

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) is 4.25%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that IEFV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFV.LESIE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

8.04%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

19.18%

-8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

22.92%

-9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

24.32%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

24.58%

-7.88%

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFV.L vs. ESIE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFV.L nor ESIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFV.L and ESIE.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.

IEFV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ESIE.L is Energy Equities. IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while ESIE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFV.L and 0.18% for ESIE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFV.L and ESIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer