PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEFM.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and XSKR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while XSKR.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFM.L returned 12.41%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for XSKR.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEFM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSKR.L.

Performance

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than XSKR.L's 4.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFM.L has outperformed XSKR.L with an annualized return of 12.41%, while XSKR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.84% annualized return.

IEFM.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.10%
YTD
6.92%
6M
10.66%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
12.41%

XSKR.L

1D
0.08%
1M
3.18%
YTD
4.33%
6M
5.90%
1Y
-6.15%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF		6.92%33.05%15.03%10.37%-9.80%14.07%17.04%23.39%-9.90%16.64%
XSKR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C		4.33%9.54%11.64%14.09%-6.11%7.74%-7.30%-1.29%-7.60%4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFM.L and XSKR.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between IEFM.L and XSKR.L has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IEFM.L
XSKR.L

Financial Services

23.3%

-

Healthcare

16.0%

-

Industrials

14.8%

-

Utilities

12.2%

-

Energy

11.2%

-

Technology

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Communication Services

3.0%
90.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.4%
10.1%

Financial Services

IEFM.L
23.3%
XSKR.L

-

Healthcare

IEFM.L
16.0%
XSKR.L

-

Industrials

IEFM.L
14.8%
XSKR.L

-

Utilities

IEFM.L
12.2%
XSKR.L

-

Energy

IEFM.L
11.2%
XSKR.L

-

Technology

IEFM.L
8.4%
XSKR.L

-

Basic Materials

IEFM.L
7.3%
XSKR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IEFM.L
3.1%
XSKR.L

-

Communication Services

IEFM.L
3.0%
XSKR.L
90.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFM.L
0.5%
XSKR.L

-

Real Estate

IEFM.L
0.4%
XSKR.L
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with IEFM.L:
IEFM.L vs. MTUMIEFM.L vs. VUKE.DEIEFM.L vs. CEMR.DEIEFM.L vs. EXO.ASIEFM.L vs. SPYF.DEIEFM.L vs. QDVX.DEIEFM.L vs. ESIF.L
Often compared with XSKR.L:
XSKR.L vs. TELE.LXSKR.L vs. SXLC.LXSKR.L vs. XSSW.LXSKR.L vs. XUCM.LXSKR.L vs. XWTS.LXSKR.L vs. XLCS.LXSKR.L vs. XLCP.L

Return for Risk

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
XSKR.L
XSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IEFM.LXSKR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.82
-0.42

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.35
-0.49

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.94

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

-0.43

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

-0.88

+4.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFM.L and XSKR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IEFM.LXSKR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

-0.42

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.43

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.18

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.34

+0.34

Drawdowns

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum XSKR.L drawdown of -36.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and XSKR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IEFM.LXSKR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-36.21%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-14.35%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-14.35%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-17.88%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

-36.21%

+12.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-8.12%

+6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-9.33%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

6.97%

-1.18%

Volatility

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) is 3.99%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that IEFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IEFM.LXSKR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.93%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

12.18%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

14.73%

+10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

13.60%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

15.78%

+1.25%

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSKR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEFM.L vs. XSKR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFM.L nor XSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

IEFM.L and XSKR.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSKR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSKR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFM.L.

IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while XSKR.L is Communications Equities. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while XSKR.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFM.L and 0.20% for XSKR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and XSKR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer