PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFM.L is traded in GBp, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFM.L achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFM.L has outperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of 12.41%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return.


IEFM.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.97%
YTD
6.92%
6M
10.23%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
12.41%

UTIL.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
12.15%
6M
12.96%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
6.92%33.05%15.03%10.37%-9.80%14.07%17.04%23.39%-9.90%16.64%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
12.15%41.15%-3.27%10.84%-1.95%1.85%18.14%21.99%4.37%13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFM.L and UTIL.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.53

The correlation between IEFM.L and UTIL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFM.L
UTIL.L

Financial Services

23.3%

-

Healthcare

16.0%

-

Industrials

14.8%
4.6%

Utilities

12.2%
95.4%

Energy

11.2%

-

Technology

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Financial Services

IEFM.L
23.3%
UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

IEFM.L
16.0%
UTIL.L

-

Industrials

IEFM.L
14.8%
UTIL.L
4.6%

Utilities

IEFM.L
12.2%
UTIL.L
95.4%

Energy

IEFM.L
11.2%
UTIL.L

-

Technology

IEFM.L
8.4%
UTIL.L

-

Basic Materials

IEFM.L
7.3%
UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IEFM.L
3.1%
UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

IEFM.L
3.0%
UTIL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IEFM.L
0.5%
UTIL.L

-

Real Estate

IEFM.L
0.4%
UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFM.L
IEFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFM.LUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.50

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

10.34

-6.80

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFM.L and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFM.LUTIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.99

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.73

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.66

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.55

+0.12

Drawdowns

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFM.L drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum UTIL.L drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFM.L and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFM.LUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-28.73%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-8.58%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-12.60%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-19.90%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

-28.73%

+4.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-5.73%

+3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-5.71%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

2.91%

+2.88%

Volatility

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IEFM.L) is 3.99%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that IEFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFM.LUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

5.55%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

12.97%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

15.09%

+9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

16.35%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.82%

-0.79%

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFM.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFM.L nor UTIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFM.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFM.L.

IEFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while UTIL.L is Utilities Equities. IEFM.L tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index, while UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFM.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFM.L and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer