PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (IEF5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IEF5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities
-8.94%0.56%-32.47%49.35%
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
12.49%74.67%66.99%115.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEF5.L achieves a -8.94% return, which is significantly lower than SMH3.L's 12.49% return.


IEF5.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-10.62%
YTD
-8.94%
6M
-10.97%
1Y
-16.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMH3.L

1D
18.04%
1M
-10.93%
YTD
12.49%
6M
34.61%
1Y
269.12%
3Y*
82.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEF5.L and SMH3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEF5.L
IEF5.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IEF5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (IEF5.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEF5.LSMH3.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.56

2.75

-3.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.60

2.78

-3.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.36

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

6.66

-7.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

21.41

-22.31

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEF5.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEF5.L and SMH3.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEF5.LSMH3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

2.75

-3.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.15

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between IEF5.L and SMH3.L is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEF5.L nor SMH3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEF5.L drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, smaller than the maximum SMH3.L drawdown of -89.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEF5.L and SMH3.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IEF5.LSMH3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-89.37%

+35.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.11%

-43.09%

+14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.06%

-24.85%

-28.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-50.06%

+10.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.95%

12.21%

+6.74%

Volatility

IEF5.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 5x Long 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETP Securities (IEF5.L) is 8.39%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a volatility of 30.75%. This indicates that IEF5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IEF5.LSMH3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.39%

30.75%

-22.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

67.92%

-51.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.42%

97.22%

-67.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.95%

99.97%

-33.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.95%

99.97%

-33.02%