IEEM.L vs. IS15.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IEEM.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IS15.L (iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IS15.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEEM.L returned 11.54%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for IS15.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEEM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IS15.L.

Performance

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IEEM.L is traded in GBp, while IS15.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IS15.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEEM.L achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than IS15.L's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IEEM.L has outperformed IS15.L with an annualized return of 11.54%, while IS15.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.28% annualized return.

IEEM.L

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 25.90%
• 6M: 28.05%
• 1Y: 55.14%
• 3Y*: 21.65%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

IS15.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 1.03%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 6.08%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: 2.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)	25.90%	26.66%	9.88%	3.86%	-9.90%	-1.38%	15.96%	12.64%	-9.08%	25.04%
IS15.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF	0.59%	6.24%	4.89%	7.16%	-6.09%	-0.84%	3.38%	4.54%	-0.48%	1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IEEM.L and IS15.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011	0.10

Over the past year, IEEM.L and IS15.L have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEEM.L	IS15.L
Technology	36.8%	5.9%
Financial Services	19.5%	28.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	17.6%
Industrials	7.5%	25.2%
Communication Services	6.9%	3.9%
Basic Materials	6.5%	2.8%
Energy	4.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	8.5%
Healthcare	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.1%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.1%	6.0%

Return for Risk

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEEM.L

IEEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IEEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IEEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IEEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IEEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IS15.L

IS15.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
IS15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
IS15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IS15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IS15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IS15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEEM.L	IS15.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	1.77	+1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	2.57	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.38	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	2.36	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.58	9.07	+8.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the IS15.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEEM.L and IS15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEEM.L	IS15.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23	1.77	+1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.70	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.73	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.87	-0.46

Drawdowns

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEEM.L drawdown since its inception was -53.22%, which is greater than IS15.L's maximum drawdown of -12.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEEM.L and IS15.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEEM.L	IS15.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.22%	-12.18%	-41.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.12%	-1.94%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	-1.94%	-13.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.27%	-12.18%	-11.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.63%	-12.18%	-14.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-0.30%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-1.12%	-9.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	0.50%	+2.63%

Volatility

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) at 1.02%. This indicates that IEEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEEM.L	IS15.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.42%	1.02%	+6.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.55%	2.32%	+12.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	2.58%	+14.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.32%	3.30%	+13.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	3.13%	+14.98%

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEEM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IS15.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEEM.L vs. IS15.L - Dividend Comparison

IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than IS15.L's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)	2.01%	2.48%	2.86%	2.91%	3.40%	2.74%	1.98%	2.32%	2.51%	1.86%	2.09%	3.38%
IS15.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF	4.54%	4.35%	4.06%	3.05%	1.80%	1.72%	1.81%	2.03%	2.08%	2.15%	2.55%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEEM.L and IS15.L in my portfolio?

IEEM.L and IS15.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IEEM.L or IS15.L?

On fees, IEEM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEEM.L or IS15.L?

IEEM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS15.L.

What is the main difference between IEEM.L and IS15.L?

IEEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IS15.L is European Corporate Bonds. IEEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IS15.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IEEM.L and 0.20% for IS15.L.