PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEDL.L is traded in EUR, while CEUR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CEUR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEDL.L achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than CEUR.L's 7.19% return.


IEDL.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.00%
YTD
14.13%
6M
18.09%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*

CEUR.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.49%
YTD
7.19%
6M
10.08%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
14.13%35.00%10.46%13.50%-3.75%26.71%-8.76%21.78%-12.14%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
7.19%17.97%9.96%15.33%-10.81%24.63%-3.27%27.42%-9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IEDL.L and CEUR.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.87

The correlation between IEDL.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEDL.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

22.6%
25.1%

Industrials

17.0%
19.8%

Healthcare

12.3%
13.8%

Technology

12.2%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
7.2%

Basic Materials

6.2%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
6.2%

Energy

5.1%
3.5%

Utilities

4.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.7%

Financial Services

IEDL.L
22.6%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

IEDL.L
17.0%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Healthcare

IEDL.L
12.3%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Technology

IEDL.L
12.2%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

IEDL.L
8.6%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Basic Materials

IEDL.L
6.2%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IEDL.L
6.2%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Energy

IEDL.L
5.1%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Utilities

IEDL.L
4.5%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Communication Services

IEDL.L
3.7%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

IEDL.L
0.6%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEDL.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

1.62

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

5.83

+6.90

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEDL.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEDL.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.27

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.65

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.54

+0.05

Drawdowns

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEDL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -36.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEDL.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEDL.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-36.02%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-10.05%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-15.75%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.57%

-21.40%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.25%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-5.65%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.80%

-0.19%

Volatility

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 4.47%. This indicates that IEDL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEDL.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.47%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

10.56%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

12.84%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

14.33%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

15.73%

+2.24%

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEDL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEDL.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while CEUR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IEDL.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEDL.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEDL.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer