PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IEAH.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEAH.L is traded in GBP, while 0GGH.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0GGH.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEAH.L achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than 0GGH.L's -3.12% return.


IEAH.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.36%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*

0GGH.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.47%
6M
-2.67%
YTD
-3.12%
1Y
-0.95%
3Y*
1.76%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEAH.L
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
-0.36%5.19%5.53%8.98%-12.43%-0.56%2.89%7.56%0.31%
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-3.12%7.99%-3.15%2.27%-8.58%-9.33%9.94%-0.40%2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IEAH.L and 0GGH.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018

0.26

The correlation between IEAH.L and 0GGH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEAH.L
IEAH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IEAH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

0GGH.L
0GGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IEAH.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEAH.L0GGH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.96

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.25

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

-0.61

+2.11

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEAH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the 0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEAH.L and 0GGH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEAH.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum 0GGH.L drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAH.L and 0GGH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEAH.L0GGH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-22.95%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-4.98%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.10%

-4.98%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.50%

-22.95%

+6.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-16.49%

+15.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-11.93%

+8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.06%

-1.06%

Volatility

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IEAH.L) is 0.73%, while iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that IEAH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0GGH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEAH.L0GGH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

1.39%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

3.75%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

5.05%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

24.42%

-19.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

21.54%

-16.52%

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEAH.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 0GGH.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEAH.L vs. 0GGH.L - Dividend Comparison

IEAH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while 0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEAH.L
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.27%3.23%3.27%2.42%0.77%0.75%0.78%1.04%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEAH.L and 0GGH.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 0GGH.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0GGH.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEAH.L.

IEAH.L tracks iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while 0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEAH.L and 0.10% for 0GGH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEAH.L and 0GGH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer