IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L
IEAC.L (iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IEAC.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist), while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.L returned 0.64%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEAC.L is traded in EUR, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEAC.L achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -2.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 0.64%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.33% annualized return.
IEAC.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- 6M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 26.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.L iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | -1.35% | 3.22% | 4.32% | 7.42% | -13.36% | -1.07% | 2.60% | 6.20% | -1.47% | 2.20% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -3.60% | 45.64% | 34.39% | 9.51% | 6.07% | 3.50% | 13.41% | 21.93% | 3.07% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEAC.L and SGLN.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEAC.L
SGLN.L
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEAC.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEAC.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.07 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 2.55 | -2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEAC.L drawdown since its inception was -24.28%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -47.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAC.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEAC.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.28% | -47.83% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -22.56% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -22.56% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.28% | -22.56% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.28% | -22.56% | -1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -21.52% | +18.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -22.38% | +19.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 9.51% | -7.50% |
Volatility
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEAC.L) is 0.87%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that IEAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEAC.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 6.72% | -5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.11% | 21.21% | +14.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.42% | 24.52% | +11.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 22.10% | -5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.32% | 18.02% | -5.70% |
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEAC.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
IEAC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.L iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.30% | 3.29% | 3.39% | 2.51% | 0.84% | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.52% | 1.66% | 0.90% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEAC.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IEAC.L.
IEAC.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. IEAC.L tracks iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist), while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAC.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for IEAC.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer