PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SUSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEAA.L is traded in EUR, while SUSS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUSS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IEAA.L having a 0.56% return and SUSS.L slightly lower at 0.55%.


IEAA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.50%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*

SUSS.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.83%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.56%3.10%4.31%7.51%-13.40%-1.11%2.70%6.24%-1.48%0.45%
SUSS.L
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.57%2.75%4.31%4.31%-3.44%-0.67%0.22%1.90%-0.80%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IEAA.L and SUSS.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEAA.L
IEAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSS.L
SUSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SUSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SUSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEAA.LSUSS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.72

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

6.00

-3.44

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the SUSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEAA.L and SUSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEAA.LSUSS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.84

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.45

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.20

-0.03

Drawdowns

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEAA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, which is greater than SUSS.L's maximum drawdown of -8.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAA.L and SUSS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEAA.LSUSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-8.91%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-1.15%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.73%

-1.16%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.29%

-6.27%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.10%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-1.19%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.33%

+0.44%

Volatility

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SUSS.L) at 1.00%. This indicates that IEAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEAA.LSUSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.00%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

1.80%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

2.35%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

3.58%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

4.28%

+0.40%

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEAA.L vs. SUSS.L - Dividend Comparison

IEAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUSS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUSS.L
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.94%2.99%3.00%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.28%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEAA.L and SUSS.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUSS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUSS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IEAA.L.

IEAA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SUSS.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAA.L and 0.12% for SUSS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEAA.L and SUSS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer