PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEAA.L is traded in EUR, while SUKC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SUKC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEAA.L achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than SUKC.L's -0.59% return.


IEAA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.50%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*

SUKC.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.91%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
-2.85%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.56%3.10%4.31%7.51%-13.40%-1.11%2.70%6.24%-1.48%0.45%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.57%-1.52%9.87%9.44%-10.63%5.66%-2.52%11.31%-1.66%-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IEAA.L and SUKC.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEAA.L
IEAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SUKC.L
SUKC.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEAA.LSUKC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.95

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

-0.55

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

-0.88

+3.43

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEAA.L and SUKC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEAA.LSUKC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

-0.35

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.18

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.19

-0.01

Drawdowns

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEAA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum SUKC.L drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAA.L and SUKC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEAA.LSUKC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-26.12%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-5.18%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.73%

-6.14%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.29%

-16.49%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-3.84%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-9.09%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.24%

-2.47%

Volatility

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) is 1.30%, while SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that IEAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUKC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEAA.LSUKC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.74%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

5.21%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

8.12%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.47%

7.44%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

8.77%

-4.09%

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEAA.L and SUKC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEAA.L vs. SUKC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEAA.L nor SUKC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEAA.L
iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%2.29%4.41%3.05%1.76%1.77%1.97%1.93%1.88%2.44%2.40%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEAA.L and SUKC.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEAA.L and SUKC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IEAA.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEAA.L and SUKC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer