IEAA.L vs. AIS
IEAA.L (iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEAA.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares. IEAA.L is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, IEAA.L returned 2.08% vs 190.51% for AIS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEAA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.
Performance
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEAA.L is traded in EUR, while AIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEAA.L achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 106.52% return.
IEAA.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
AIS
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 9.66%
- YTD
- 106.52%
- 6M
- 113.58%
- 1Y
- 190.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IEAA.L iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.75% | 3.08% | -0.76% |
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 106.52% | 39.56% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEAA.L and AIS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEAA.L vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank
IEAA.L
AIS
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEAA.L | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.66 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 12.38 | -11.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 38.44 | -35.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEAA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAA.L and AIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEAA.L | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -36.12% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -15.49% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -6.73% | +5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -6.89% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 4.98% | -4.25% |
Volatility
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) is 1.32%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 19.94%. This indicates that IEAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEAA.L | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 19.94% | -18.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 32.99% | -29.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 38.59% | -35.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 39.94% | -35.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 39.94% | -35.21% |
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEAA.L vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEAA.L nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IEAA.L and AIS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEAA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEAA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
IEAA.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while AIS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAA.L and 0.75% for AIS.
Find the right allocation for IEAA.L and AIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer