PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IE15.L vs. IEAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IE15.L) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IE15.L achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly higher than IEAC.L's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IE15.L has outperformed IEAC.L with an annualized return of 0.76%, while IEAC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.64% annualized return.


IE15.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.18%
6M
0.17%
YTD
-1.15%
1Y
-0.29%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
0.76%

IEAC.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.43%
6M
0.07%
YTD
-1.30%
1Y
-0.34%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
0.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IE15.L
iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-1.15%3.42%4.34%5.77%-7.79%-0.34%1.06%2.63%-0.65%0.86%
IEAC.L
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-1.30%3.22%4.32%7.42%-13.36%-1.07%2.60%6.20%-1.47%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IE15.L and IEAC.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009

0.75

The correlation between IE15.L and IEAC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IE15.L
IE15.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IE15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IE15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IE15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IE15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IE15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IEAC.L
IEAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
IEAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IE15.L) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IE15.LIEAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.15

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.01

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

-0.17

-0.08

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IE15.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the IEAC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IE15.L and IEAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IE15.L drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, smaller than the maximum IEAC.L drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IE15.L and IEAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IE15.LIEAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-24.28%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-23.42%

+20.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.86%

-23.42%

+20.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.14%

-24.28%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.14%

-24.28%

+14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-2.79%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-3.03%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

2.02%

-0.86%

Volatility

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IE15.L) is 0.58%, while iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEAC.L) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that IE15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IE15.LIEAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.86%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

36.11%

-34.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

36.42%

-33.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

16.86%

-14.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.32%

12.32%

-9.00%

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IE15.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IEAC.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IE15.L vs. IEAC.L - Dividend Comparison

IE15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than IEAC.L's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IE15.L
iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.51%2.92%2.50%1.41%0.51%0.57%0.59%0.62%0.62%0.68%0.90%0.56%
IEAC.L
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.65%3.29%3.39%2.51%0.84%0.81%0.84%1.10%0.98%1.52%1.66%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


IE15.L and IEAC.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEAC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEAC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IE15.L.

IE15.L is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IEAC.L is European Corporate Bonds. IE15.L tracks BBG Euro Corp 1-5 Yrs (EUR), while IEAC.L tracks BBG Euro Corporate Index (EUR). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IE15.L and 0.09% for IEAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IE15.L and IEAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer