PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDXGX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Index Solution 2030 Portfolio (IDXGX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDXGX achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IDXGX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 8.96%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


IDXGX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.66%
YTD
7.95%
6M
8.36%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
8.96%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDXGX
Voya Index Solution 2030 Portfolio
7.95%15.39%10.45%15.48%-16.42%12.43%13.74%20.99%-6.10%17.14%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IDXGX and FFGZX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.77

The correlation between IDXGX and FFGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDXGX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDXGX
IDXGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IDXGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDXGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDXGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDXGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDXGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Index Solution 2030 Portfolio (IDXGX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDXGXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.64

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

3.97

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.54

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.18

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.31

14.23

+1.08

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDXGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDXGX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDXGXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.65

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.97

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.93

-0.10

Drawdowns

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDXGX drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDXGX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDXGXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-14.94%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-3.33%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.16%

-4.76%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

-14.94%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.45%

-14.94%

-10.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-2.26%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.74%

+0.61%

Volatility

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Index Solution 2030 Portfolio (IDXGX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that IDXGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDXGXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.49%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

3.34%

+3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.28%

4.01%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.83%

5.08%

+5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.83%

4.43%

+7.40%

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDXGX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDXGX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

IDXGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
IDXGX
Voya Index Solution 2030 Portfolio
2.47%2.66%1.42%7.30%12.39%4.95%4.22%4.56%3.86%0.98%0.16%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDXGX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDXGX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDXGX dropped -25.45% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDXGX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer