IDVO vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IDVO returned 35.30% vs 11.86% for OMAH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

IDVO vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDVO achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.02% return.

IDVO

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 6M: 13.59%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 11.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDVO vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	13.58%	27.22%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.02%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IDVO and OMAH is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	0.40

IDVO vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDVO	OMAH
Financial Services	19.9%	37.3%
Basic Materials	17.1%	-
Energy	12.5%	8.8%
Technology	10.7%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.3%	19.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	13.2%
Healthcare	7.8%	4.4%
Industrials	7.2%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	4.1%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

IDVO vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDVO

IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 70
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 52
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDVO vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDVO	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.48	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.08	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.26	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	3.97	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	9.48	+3.54

IDVO vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDVO and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDVO vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDVO drawdown since its inception was -15.46%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVO and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDVO	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.46%	-11.83%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-3.00%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-2.23%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-1.27%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	1.25%	+1.47%

Volatility

IDVO vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.23%. This indicates that IDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDVO	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	2.23%	+3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	5.58%	+8.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	8.06%	+8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	13.05%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.47%	13.05%	+3.42%

IDVO vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDVO vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

IDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than OMAH's 15.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	5.50%	5.42%	6.14%	5.72%	1.96%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.38%	12.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDVO and OMAH in my portfolio?

IDVO and OMAH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDVO or OMAH?

IDVO has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to OMAH (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVO dropped -15.46% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, IDVO or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, IDVO leads with 35.30% vs 11.86% for OMAH. On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDVO or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, IDVO has performed better with a 35.30% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDVO or OMAH?

IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDVO or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.38%, compared with 5.50% for IDVO.

What is the main difference between IDVO and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDVO and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.