IDV vs. VNQI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI).
IDV and VNQI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. It was launched on Jun 11, 2007. VNQI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2010. Both IDV and VNQI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDV or VNQI.
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and VNQI is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
IDV vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IDV:
0.43
VNQI:
-0.24
IDV:
0.63
VNQI:
-0.22
IDV:
1.09
VNQI:
0.97
IDV:
0.59
VNQI:
-0.13
IDV:
1.44
VNQI:
-0.46
IDV:
4.44%
VNQI:
7.55%
IDV:
14.87%
VNQI:
14.75%
IDV:
-70.14%
VNQI:
-38.35%
IDV:
-10.82%
VNQI:
-27.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has outperformed VNQI with an annualized return of 3.85%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively lower -0.36% annualized return.
IDV
3.32%
-8.98%
-3.16%
6.54%
10.77%
3.85%
VNQI
-4.27%
-6.91%
-14.01%
-3.73%
0.43%
-0.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IDV vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDV vs. VNQI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IDV
VNQI
IDV vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDV vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than VNQI's 5.39% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
---|
Drawdowns
IDV vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and VNQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDV vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is NaN%, while Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Market filter for screeners
Scott Allen
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca