IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L
IDUS.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - IDUS.L tracks the S&P 500 while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDUS.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for PQVM.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.
Performance
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDUS.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.65% return.
IDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 17.79%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDUS.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 10.32% | 17.36% | 25.31% | 26.75% | -18.68% | 29.32% | 17.63% | 30.58% | -5.51% | 13.61% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.65% | 13.66% | 30.17% | 6.82% | 0.52% | 26.13% | 8.05% | 25.07% | -6.99% | 18.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDUS.L and PQVM.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IDUS.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Financial Services
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Communication Services
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Cyclical
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Healthcare
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Industrials
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Defensive
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Energy
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Utilities
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Real Estate
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
-
Basic Materials
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDUS.L
PQVM.L
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDUS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.70 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.66 | 16.26 | -1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDUS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.06 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.96 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.87 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, which is greater than PQVM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDUS.L and PQVM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDUS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.48% | -34.42% | -21.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -4.83% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | -15.49% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.38% | -17.35% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -3.90% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.40% | +0.50% |
Volatility
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDUS.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.15% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 8.76% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 11.01% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 16.13% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 17.13% | -0.81% |
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison
IDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than PQVM.L's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDUS.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.86% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.03% | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.44% | 1.42% | 1.55% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDUS.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
IDUS.L tracks S&P 500, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDUS.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.
Find the right allocation for IDUS.L and PQVM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer