PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDTW.L achieves a 51.77% return, which is significantly higher than IPOL.L's 14.81% return. Over the past 10 years, IDTW.L has outperformed IPOL.L with an annualized return of 19.92%, while IPOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.


IDTW.L

1D
-3.99%
1M
-10.58%
6M
42.72%
YTD
51.77%
1Y
73.35%
3Y*
37.69%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
19.92%

IPOL.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.95%
6M
12.69%
YTD
14.81%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
51.77%31.78%23.61%28.84%-29.55%28.51%34.35%34.44%-9.12%28.06%
IPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.81%72.75%-6.10%49.20%-26.61%6.83%-11.21%-6.81%-12.61%54.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IDTW.L and IPOL.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2011

0.51

The correlation between IDTW.L and IPOL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTW.L
IDTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOL.L
IPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDTW.LIPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.22

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

2.93

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

6.74

+9.75

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the IPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTW.L and IPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTW.L drawdown since its inception was -60.07%, smaller than the maximum IPOL.L drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTW.L and IPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTW.LIPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.07%

-68.05%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-10.48%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

-22.43%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-55.92%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

-65.79%

+24.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.46%

-2.95%

-11.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-29.57%

+16.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

4.57%

-0.13%

Volatility

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IPOL.L) at 5.32%. This indicates that IDTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTW.LIPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.06%

5.32%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.76%

19.48%

+5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.27%

24.82%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.97%

30.15%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

27.40%

-4.99%

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IDTW.L and IPOL.L have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

IDTW.L vs. IPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while IPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.99%1.51%1.43%2.09%3.39%1.35%1.73%2.15%2.78%2.70%3.10%3.33%
IPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDTW.L and IPOL.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDTW.L and IPOL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

IDTW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while IPOL.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD), while IPOL.L tracks MSCI Emerging - Poland in Net USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTW.L and IPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer