IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L
IDTP.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and TIPG.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDTP.L returned 0.96%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TIPG.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDTP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TIPG.L.
Performance
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IDTP.L is traded in USD, while TIPG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TIPG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTP.L achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than TIPG.L's 1.21% return.
IDTP.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
TIPG.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.09% | 6.94% | 2.15% | 3.71% | -12.76% | 6.17% | 10.98% | 8.68% | -1.43% | 3.28% |
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.21% | 5.93% | 1.12% | 2.23% | -12.73% | 5.32% | 9.85% | 8.89% | -2.36% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTP.L and TIPG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IDTP.L and TIPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTP.L
TIPG.L
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDTP.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.43 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 3.30 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDTP.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.71 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.02 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.28 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTP.L drawdown since its inception was -15.12%, smaller than the maximum TIPG.L drawdown of -16.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTP.L and TIPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTP.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -16.32% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -2.60% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.51% | -4.85% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.12% | -16.32% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -4.25% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -5.47% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 1.13% | -0.44% |
Volatility
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) is 1.30%, while Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that IDTP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTP.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 1.86% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 4.06% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 5.29% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.13% | 7.26% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 7.86% | -1.49% |
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TIPG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDTP.L vs. TIPG.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTP.L and TIPG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IDTP.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IDTP.L and 0.09% for TIPG.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTP.L and TIPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer