PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDTP.L is traded in USD, while 0TPE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0TPE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDTP.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than 0TPE.L's -2.44% return.


IDTP.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.92%
YTD
0.66%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
2.39%

0TPE.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-1.38%
YTD
-2.44%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
-2.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDTP.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.66%6.94%2.15%3.71%-12.76%6.17%10.98%8.68%0.23%
0TPE.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-2.44%18.50%-6.18%4.58%-18.80%-3.13%18.93%3.95%-9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IDTP.L and 0TPE.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018

0.33

The correlation between IDTP.L and 0TPE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTP.L
IDTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IDTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

0TPE.L
0TPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
0TPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDTP.L0TPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.02

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

0.04

+4.40

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the 0TPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTP.L and 0TPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTP.L drawdown since its inception was -39.19%, which is greater than 0TPE.L's maximum drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTP.L and 0TPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTP.L0TPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.19%

-30.42%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.92%

-5.84%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-11.95%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.12%

-30.42%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-11.70%

+10.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-11.99%

+7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

2.76%

-2.02%

Volatility

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) is 0.81%, while iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that IDTP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0TPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTP.L0TPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.86%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

5.58%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

7.36%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

13.50%

-7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

12.84%

-6.49%

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IDTP.L and 0TPE.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDTP.L vs. 0TPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IDTP.L nor 0TPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IDTP.L and 0TPE.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDTP.L and 0TPE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

IDTP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while 0TPE.L tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTP.L and 0TPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer