IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L
IDTM.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XGDU.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTM.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while XGDU.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDTM.L returned 33.73%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for XGDU.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDTM.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XGDU.L.
Performance
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTM.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than XGDU.L's 3.77% return.
IDTM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 33.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.02%
XGDU.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 32.35%
- 3Y*
- 31.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.47% | 7.33% | 1.12% | 2.88% | 116.97% | 187.86% | -0.93% |
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 3.77% | 64.71% | 26.20% | 13.45% | 0.32% | -3.91% | 9.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTM.L and XGDU.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2020 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTM.L
XGDU.L
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDTM.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.84 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 4.73 | -2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDTM.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.30 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.08 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.00 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTM.L drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum XGDU.L drawdown of -21.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTM.L and XGDU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTM.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -21.59% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -17.47% | +13.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | -17.47% | +10.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -21.00% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -15.82% | +12.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -7.31% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 6.82% | -5.43% |
Volatility
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) is 1.97%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that IDTM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTM.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 6.39% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 21.85% | -18.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 24.87% | -20.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.73% | 17.32% | +61.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.69% | 17.31% | +42.38% |
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XGDU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDTM.L vs. XGDU.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while XGDU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.25% | 3.11% | 5.23% | 2.48% | 66.26% | 84.42% | 1.24% | 1.92% | 1.82% | 1.49% | 1.45% |
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTM.L and XGDU.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XGDU.L.
IDTM.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while XGDU.L is Precious Metals. IDTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while XGDU.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDTM.L and 0.12% for XGDU.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTM.L and XGDU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer