IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L
IDTM.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and LQDA.L (iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IDTM.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while LQDA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDTM.L returned 33.73%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for LQDA.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDTM.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LQDA.L.
Performance
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTM.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA.L's 0.02% return.
IDTM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 33.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.02%
LQDA.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.47% | 7.33% | 1.12% | 2.88% | 116.97% | 187.86% | 9.38% | 8.43% | -0.05% | -0.31% |
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.02% | 8.01% | 1.25% | 8.99% | -17.75% | -1.66% | 10.56% | 18.22% | -4.30% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDTM.L and LQDA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IDTM.L and LQDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IDTM.L
LQDA.L
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDTM.L | LQDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.66 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 4.58 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDTM.L | LQDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.98 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | -0.00 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.28 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTM.L drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum LQDA.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTM.L and LQDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDTM.L | LQDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -25.10% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -3.32% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | -7.86% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -25.10% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -3.58% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -6.81% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.20% | +0.19% |
Volatility
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) is 1.97%, while iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that IDTM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDTM.L | LQDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 2.23% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 4.27% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 5.67% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.73% | 8.47% | +70.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.69% | 9.11% | +50.58% |
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDTM.L vs. LQDA.L - Dividend Comparison
IDTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while LQDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.25% | 3.11% | 5.23% | 2.48% | 66.26% | 84.42% | 1.24% | 1.92% | 1.82% | 1.49% | 1.45% |
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDTM.L and LQDA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LQDA.L.
IDTM.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while LQDA.L is Corporate Bonds. IDTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while LQDA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IDTM.L and 0.20% for LQDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IDTM.L and LQDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer