PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDTM.L is traded in USD, while BBLL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BBLL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDTM.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.L's 1.39% return.


IDTM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
33.73%
10Y*
23.02%

BBLL.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDTM.L and BBLL.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTM.L
IDTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IDTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.L
BBLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDTM.LBBLL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.17

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

4.46

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.99

13.72

-11.72

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTM.L and BBLL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDTM.LBBLL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.95

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.85

-0.53

Drawdowns

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTM.L drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, which is greater than BBLL.L's maximum drawdown of -0.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTM.L and BBLL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTM.LBBLL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-0.88%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-0.88%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-0.17%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-0.23%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.29%

+1.10%

Volatility

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTM.L) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) at 1.41%. This indicates that IDTM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTM.LBBLL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.41%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.48%

3.50%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

4.15%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.73%

4.21%

+74.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.69%

4.21%

+55.48%

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IDTM.L and BBLL.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDTM.L vs. BBLL.L - Dividend Comparison

IDTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while BBLL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBLL.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.25%3.11%5.23%2.48%66.26%84.42%1.24%1.92%1.82%1.49%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDTM.L and BBLL.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDTM.L and BBLL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IDTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while BBLL.L tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTM.L and BBLL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer