PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IDTG.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDTG.L is traded in GBP, while DTLA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DTLA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDTG.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than DTLA.L's -0.58% return.


IDTG.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.70%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
-2.11%
5Y*
-6.80%
10Y*

DTLA.L

1D
0.48%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
-3.99%
5Y*
-5.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
-0.76%3.85%-7.60%0.63%-31.52%-4.51%15.37%-2.30%
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.58%-2.97%-5.34%-3.39%-22.00%-3.56%13.56%-5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IDTG.L and DTLA.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019

0.84

The correlation between IDTG.L and DTLA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDTG.L
IDTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IDTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DTLA.L
DTLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IDTG.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDTG.LDTLA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

1.26

+0.06

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDTG.L and DTLA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDTG.LDTLA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

0.49

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

-0.32

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

-0.06

-0.28

Drawdowns

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDTG.L drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, roughly equal to the maximum DTLA.L drawdown of -48.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTG.L and DTLA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDTG.LDTLA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.37%

-48.57%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-8.45%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.80%

-17.84%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.29%

-39.56%

-4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.54%

-44.65%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.88%

-26.35%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.96%

-1.01%

Volatility

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IDTG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) at 3.11%. This indicates that IDTG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDTG.LDTLA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.11%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

7.35%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

10.21%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

15.80%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

16.13%

-0.72%

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDTG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDTG.L vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison

IDTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while DTLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.24%4.20%4.64%3.69%3.04%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDTG.L and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IDTG.L.

IDTG.L is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. IDTG.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year (GBP Hedged) Index, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IDTG.L and 0.07% for DTLA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDTG.L and DTLA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer