PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IDNA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IDNA.L is traded in USD, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDNA.L achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 29.21% return.


IDNA.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.35%
6M
9.68%
YTD
10.19%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
14.35%

IWVG.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-4.12%
6M
25.30%
YTD
29.21%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDNA.L
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
10.19%17.55%24.50%26.38%-19.84%27.07%19.54%30.25%-8.87%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
29.21%41.17%4.80%19.04%-9.76%20.14%-4.01%19.28%-16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IDNA.L and IWVG.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.74

The correlation between IDNA.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDNA.L
IDNA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IDNA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDNA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDNA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IDNA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDNA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IDNA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDNA.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.60

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

6.55

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

23.13

-12.36

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDNA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDNA.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDNA.L drawdown since its inception was -56.08%, which is greater than IWVG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDNA.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDNA.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.08%

-35.79%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-8.62%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-14.64%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-26.94%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-4.24%

+3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

-6.64%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.45%

-0.38%

Volatility

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (IDNA.L) is 2.95%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that IDNA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDNA.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

6.03%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

13.95%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

16.24%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

15.95%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

17.66%

-1.46%

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDNA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDNA.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

IDNA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than IWVG.L's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDNA.L
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
0.60%0.66%0.77%0.96%1.13%0.76%1.03%1.23%1.45%1.27%1.42%1.56%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.93%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDNA.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDNA.L.

IDNA.L tracks iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDNA.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDNA.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer