PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDME vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


IDME

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.00%
6M
9.16%
YTD
15.21%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.13%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$907.21K$1.03M$881.50K
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

IDME vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
15.21%27.53%1.42%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDME vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMESBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.35

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

5.19

+4.80

IDME vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDME vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMESBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-91.35%

+62.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-47.94%

+36.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-77.87%

+75.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-69.07%

+58.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

21.67%

-18.69%

Volatility

IDME vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) is 4.84%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that IDME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMESBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

18.09%

-13.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

67.10%

-52.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

88.65%

-72.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

96.10%

-81.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

96.10%

-81.28%

IDME vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDME vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
4.59%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDME and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to IDME (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 30.13% for IDME. On fees, IDME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IDME has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 30.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.95% for SBIT.

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDME and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer