PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. FLGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDME vs. FLGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDME vs. FLGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
2.69%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.25%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
0.19%6.22%0.62%4.18%-11.53%-0.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than FLGV's 0.19% return.


IDME

1D
3.44%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
2.69%
6M
7.43%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
10Y*

FLGV

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.98%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDME vs. FLGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. FLGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGV
FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. FLGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMEFLGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

0.84

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

1.25

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.51

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.34

3.95

+4.39

IDME vs. FLGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FLGV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and FLGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMEFLGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.84

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.13

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and FLGV is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IDME vs. FLGV - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than FLGV's 4.06% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
5.63%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
4.06%4.07%4.13%3.46%2.21%1.92%0.97%

Drawdowns

IDME vs. FLGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than FLGV's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and FLGV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEFLGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-17.63%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-2.45%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-5.41%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-8.83%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.94%

+2.02%

Volatility

IDME vs. FLGV - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) at 1.45%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDMEFLGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

1.45%

+6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

2.53%

+8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

4.13%

+12.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

5.41%

+9.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

5.19%

+9.26%