PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDME vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.71% return.


IDME

1D
-2.69%
1M
0.48%
YTD
14.34%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
10Y*

FIXT

1D
0.14%
1M
1.07%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDME vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDME and FIXT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.38

IDME vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDME
FIXT

Financial Services

19.2%

-

Industrials

13.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Technology

9.9%

-

Healthcare

9.6%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

8.1%

-

Energy

5.6%

-

Communication Services

5.4%

-

Real Estate

3.2%

-

Utilities

3.0%

-

Financial Services

IDME
19.2%
FIXT

-

Industrials

IDME
13.8%
FIXT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDME
11.1%
FIXT

-

Technology

IDME
9.9%
FIXT

-

Healthcare

IDME
9.6%
FIXT
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

IDME
8.4%
FIXT

-

Basic Materials

IDME
8.1%
FIXT

-

Energy

IDME
5.6%
FIXT

-

Communication Services

IDME
5.4%
FIXT

-

Real Estate

IDME
3.2%
FIXT

-

Utilities

IDME
3.0%
FIXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMEFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.56

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

4.33

+6.59

IDME vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDME vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and FIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-3.02%

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-3.02%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-1.42%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-0.75%

-10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

1.08%

+1.84%

Volatility

IDME vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 0.91%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMEFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

0.91%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

2.48%

+11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

3.77%

+12.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

3.74%

+11.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

3.74%

+11.06%

IDME vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDME vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than FIXT's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.52%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
5.06%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDME and FIXT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDME has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

On 1-year performance, IDME leads with 31.78% vs 4.69% for FIXT. On fees, IDME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDME has performed better with a 31.78% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 5.06% for IDME.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.75% for FIXT.

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDME and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer