PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. DRSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDME vs. DRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDME vs. DRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
2.69%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.25%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
-3.23%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%-1.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than DRSK's -3.23% return.


IDME

1D
3.44%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
2.69%
6M
7.43%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
10Y*

DRSK

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-3.23%
6M
-3.42%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDME vs. DRSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DRSK's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. DRSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. DRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMEDRSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

0.50

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

0.80

+1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

0.51

+1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.34

1.39

+6.95

IDME vs. DRSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the DRSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and DRSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMEDRSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.50

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.69

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and DRSK is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IDME vs. DRSK - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than DRSK's 3.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
5.63%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.89%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%

Drawdowns

IDME vs. DRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than DRSK's maximum drawdown of -19.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and DRSK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEDRSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-19.87%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-7.20%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-6.28%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-4.26%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.63%

+0.33%

Volatility

IDME vs. DRSK - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) at 1.74%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDMEDRSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

1.74%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

5.46%

+6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

8.09%

+8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

7.22%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

7.00%

+7.45%