IDME vs. DRSK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDME is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while DRSK is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDME returned 17.49%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for DRSK. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DRSK.

Performance

IDME vs. DRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than DRSK's 2.54% return.

IDME

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 14.34%
• 6M: 14.11%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRSK

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 6.97%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: 2.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDME vs. DRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	14.34%	27.53%	6.12%	9.07%	-19.79%	-1.16%
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF	2.54%	7.67%	12.50%	2.08%	-9.57%	-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and DRSK is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021	0.49

The correlation between IDME and DRSK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IDME vs. DRSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME

IDME Risk / Return Rank: 63
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 65

DRSK

DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 23
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. DRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDME	DRSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	0.84	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	1.31	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.15	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	0.97	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.92	2.48	+8.44

IDME vs. DRSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the DRSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and DRSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDME vs. DRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than DRSK's maximum drawdown of -19.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and DRSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDME	DRSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.20%	-19.87%	-9.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	-7.20%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-9.60%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-2.39%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.06%	-4.20%	-6.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.82%	+0.10%

Volatility

IDME vs. DRSK - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) at 2.37%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDME	DRSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	2.37%	+4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.22%	5.27%	+8.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	8.36%	+8.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.80%	7.43%	+7.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.80%	7.06%	+7.74%

IDME vs. DRSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DRSK's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDME vs. DRSK - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than DRSK's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF	3.67%	3.67%	3.31%	3.57%	1.93%	2.64%	5.69%	3.04%	2.62%
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	5.06%	4.90%	5.64%	3.71%	2.62%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDME and DRSK in my portfolio?

IDME and DRSK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDME or DRSK?

IDME has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to DRSK (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs DRSK's -19.87%.

Which ETF is better, IDME or DRSK?

On 3-year performance, IDME leads with 17.49% vs 9.02% for DRSK. On fees, IDME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDME or DRSK?

Over the 3-year period, IDME has performed better with a 17.49% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDME or DRSK?

IDME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDME or DRSK?

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 3.67% for DRSK.

What is the main difference between IDME and DRSK?

IDME is categorized as Global Equities, while DRSK is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.79% for DRSK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.