IDME vs. AVGV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IDME (Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDME returned 16.93%/yr vs 20.17%/yr for AVGV. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IDME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.

Performance

IDME vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 19.44% return.

IDME

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 8.88%
• YTD: 15.77%
• 1Y: 30.76%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: 6.08%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.22%

AVGV

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 11.09%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 1Y: 35.33%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	$5.38M	$4.64M	$3.97M
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	$938.24K	$1.05M	$895.28K

IDME vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	15.77%	27.53%	6.12%	3.98%
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	19.44%	22.57%	11.26%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and AVGV is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.82

The correlation between IDME and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDME vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDME	AVGV
Financial Services	19.2%	24.0%
Industrials	13.8%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	14.4%
Technology	9.9%	11.8%
Healthcare	9.6%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.4%	5.0%
Basic Materials	8.1%	6.6%
Energy	5.6%	11.5%
Communication Services	5.4%	4.8%
Real Estate	3.2%	0.7%
Utilities	3.0%	0.6%

Return for Risk

IDME vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDME

IDME Risk / Return Rank: 75
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 76

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 93
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDME vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDME	AVGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.69	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.73	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.49	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	4.37	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	17.10	-6.75

IDME vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDME vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and AVGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDME	AVGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.20%	-17.03%	-12.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	-8.12%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-17.03%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	0.00%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.87%	-2.23%	-8.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.07%	+0.91%

Volatility

IDME vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) at 3.10%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDME	AVGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	3.10%	+1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.52%	10.27%	+4.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.53%	13.24%	+3.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.84%	14.87%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.81%	14.87%	-0.06%

IDME vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDME vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than AVGV's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	1.60%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%
IDME Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	4.57%	4.90%	5.64%	3.71%	2.62%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDME and AVGV in my portfolio?

IDME and AVGV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDME or AVGV?

IDME has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to AVGV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDME dropped -29.20% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

Which ETF is better, IDME or AVGV?

On 3-year performance, AVGV leads with 20.17% vs 16.93% for IDME. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDME or AVGV?

Over the 3-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 16.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDME or AVGV?

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDME or AVGV?

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.60% for AVGV.

What is the main difference between IDME and AVGV?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IDME and 0.26% for AVGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.