PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IDJP.L having a 12.62% return and CJPU.L slightly lower at 12.44%. Over the past 10 years, IDJP.L has underperformed CJPU.L with an annualized return of 7.71%, while CJPU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.


IDJP.L

1D
-2.38%
1M
-2.94%
6M
8.01%
YTD
12.62%
1Y
26.24%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
7.71%

CJPU.L

1D
-2.51%
1M
-5.70%
6M
6.20%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
30.44%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.62%29.69%3.33%13.53%-12.68%-3.28%8.14%17.67%-16.75%31.70%
CJPU.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.44%26.13%7.33%20.25%-17.32%0.50%16.08%17.64%-13.50%24.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IDJP.L and CJPU.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2010

0.66

The correlation between IDJP.L and CJPU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDJP.L
IDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CJPU.L
CJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDJP.LCJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.37

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

7.70

-1.04

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDJP.L and CJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than CJPU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDJP.L and CJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-32.64%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-12.79%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

-14.74%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-32.64%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-32.64%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-7.07%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-5.86%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.94%

-0.01%

Volatility

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDJP.L) is 5.64%, while iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that IDJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

7.14%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

18.29%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

21.85%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

18.44%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

17.12%

-0.46%

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDJP.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CJPU.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

IDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while CJPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CJPU.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.00%1.77%1.77%1.77%2.08%1.55%1.48%1.47%1.45%1.21%1.20%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDJP.L and CJPU.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CJPU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CJPU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IDJP.L.

IDJP.L tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index (Net), while CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for IDJP.L and 0.12% for CJPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDJP.L and CJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer