PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (VERX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDJG.AS achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than VERX.AS's 7.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDJG.AS having a 10.03% annualized return and VERX.AS not far behind at 9.69%.


IDJG.AS

1D
0.46%
1M
7.49%
YTD
11.17%
6M
11.08%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
10.03%

VERX.AS

1D
0.65%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.73%
6M
10.13%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDJG.AS
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF
11.17%10.86%10.46%20.59%-17.31%26.89%6.04%34.28%-10.77%12.45%
VERX.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
7.73%20.65%7.05%18.49%-12.99%24.93%2.62%26.48%-10.05%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IDJG.AS and VERX.AS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.88

The correlation between IDJG.AS and VERX.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDJG.AS
IDJG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IDJG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDJG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VERX.AS
VERX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VERX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VERX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (VERX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDJG.ASVERX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.54

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.68

5.65

-1.97

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDJG.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the VERX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDJG.AS and VERX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDJG.ASVERX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.17

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.59

-0.21

Drawdowns

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDJG.AS drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, which is greater than VERX.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDJG.AS and VERX.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDJG.ASVERX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.97%

-34.59%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-10.21%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.09%

-16.22%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.00%

-22.89%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-34.59%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.39%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.36%

-5.73%

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.79%

+1.09%

Volatility

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IDJG.AS) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (VERX.AS) at 4.34%. This indicates that IDJG.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VERX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDJG.ASVERX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.34%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

11.06%

+4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

13.49%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

14.86%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

15.73%

+3.06%

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDJG.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VERX.AS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDJG.AS vs. VERX.AS - Dividend Comparison

IDJG.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VERX.AS's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDJG.AS
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF
1.08%1.04%0.97%0.94%1.00%0.55%0.99%1.39%1.55%1.57%1.80%1.72%
VERX.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
2.48%2.67%2.91%2.75%3.05%2.29%1.96%2.83%3.20%2.71%2.81%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IDJG.AS and VERX.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VERX.AS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VERX.AS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDJG.AS.

IDJG.AS tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while VERX.AS tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDJG.AS and 0.10% for VERX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDJG.AS and VERX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer