IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IDFN.L (Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IDFN.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Kensho Global Future Defense Index, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IDFN.L returned 75.98% vs 58.77% for XLKQ.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDFN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.

Performance

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc (IDFN.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IDFN.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDFN.L achieves a 34.54% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's 27.51% return.

IDFN.L

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 12.42%
• YTD: 34.54%
• 6M: 43.45%
• 1Y: 75.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 18.87%
• YTD: 27.51%
• 6M: 26.93%
• 1Y: 58.77%
• 3Y*: 38.25%
• 5Y*: 26.08%
• 10Y*: 26.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IDFN.L Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc	34.54%	55.93%	6.12%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	26.33%	24.49%	2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IDFN.L and XLKQ.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024	0.56

The correlation between IDFN.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDFN.L

IDFN.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
IDFN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IDFN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IDFN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IDFN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IDFN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc (IDFN.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDFN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	3.01	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.88	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	3.48	+2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.53	10.61	+5.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDFN.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDFN.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDFN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	3.01	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.43	1.19	+1.24

Drawdowns

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDFN.L drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDFN.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDFN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.71%	-35.00%	+21.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.39%	-16.81%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	0.00%	-5.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-5.75%	+2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	5.52%	-0.94%

Volatility

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc (IDFN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 5.98%. This indicates that IDFN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDFN.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	5.98%	+4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.07%	14.68%	+6.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.94%	19.52%	+6.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.89%	23.30%	+3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.89%	22.21%	+4.68%

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDFN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDFN.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IDFN.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDFN.L and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

IDFN.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDFN.L or XLKQ.L?

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDFN.L or XLKQ.L?

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IDFN.L.

What is the main difference between IDFN.L and XLKQ.L?

IDFN.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. IDFN.L tracks S&P Kensho Global Future Defense Index, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IDFN.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.