PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDFF.L achieves a 23.86% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 51.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IDFF.L has underperformed IDTW.L with an annualized return of 9.44%, while IDTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.92% annualized return.


IDFF.L

1D
-2.62%
1M
-10.76%
6M
15.47%
YTD
23.86%
1Y
42.96%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
9.44%

IDTW.L

1D
-3.99%
1M
-10.58%
6M
42.72%
YTD
51.77%
1Y
73.35%
3Y*
37.69%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
19.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
23.86%39.49%12.16%1.47%-21.79%-9.20%25.91%17.27%-15.18%41.70%
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
51.77%31.78%23.61%28.84%-29.55%28.51%34.35%34.44%-9.12%28.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IDFF.L and IDTW.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2006

0.76

The correlation between IDFF.L and IDTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDFF.L
IDFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IDTW.L
IDTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDFF.LIDTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

5.05

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

16.48

-6.73

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDFF.L and IDTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDFF.L drawdown since its inception was -64.08%, which is greater than IDTW.L's maximum drawdown of -60.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDFF.L and IDTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDFF.LIDTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.08%

-60.07%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-14.46%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-28.24%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-40.98%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.09%

-40.98%

-9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.06%

-14.46%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-12.59%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

4.44%

-0.04%

Volatility

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) is 10.68%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that IDFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDFF.LIDTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

12.06%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.20%

24.76%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

28.27%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

23.97%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

22.41%

-1.58%

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IDFF.L and IDTW.L have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

IDFF.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison

IDFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than IDTW.L's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.13%1.46%1.85%1.85%2.07%1.39%1.13%1.67%2.04%1.50%1.92%2.29%
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.99%1.51%1.43%2.09%3.39%1.35%1.73%2.15%2.78%2.70%3.10%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDFF.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDFF.L and IDTW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

IDFF.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IDTW.L is Technology Equities. IDFF.L tracks MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD), while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDFF.L and IDTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer